![]() ![]() (RAID 10 offers us faster data transfer speeds and Btrfs offers us snapshots and file self-healing.) SHR does offer an advantage over traditional RAID if you have HDDs of different sizes, or if you're going to replace smaller HDDs with larger capacity ones. We put four Seagate Exos X12 HDDs in it and are running a RAID 10 configuration with Btrfs. We purchased a Synology RS818RP+ a few months ago and are loving it. Where is the sweet spot for money/features. I'm trying to find a solution which is cost-effective. I'm also not interested in giving Amazon any more money! ![]() So if anyone has an alternative I am all ears? I'm curious about pros and cons, I might not have considered. The other option is possibly Wasabi, although I am not at all familiar with them. The only drawbacks I can see are that that they operate a single datacentre which is located in the US and also that they don't offer encryption at rest. I'm thinking about using Backblaze's B2 cloud. I'm just getting a 4 disk raid (the 918+), I was wondering what everyone's thoughts were on SHR over RAID 10? If my reading of this is correct SHR is just Software RAID using BTFRS? That right. SHR: I was thinking of putting in a RAID 10 however I've seen a lot of people bang on about SHR. And I think that this could be useful for all sorts of other applications at home.ĭeduplication: After searching around the web I'm a bit confused about whether Synology's backup solution dedupes? I think it does but it's not at all clear to me. I'm also thinking of enacting a disk-to-disk-to-cloud regime. I'm thinking of purchasing a NAS box for my home. The issue is that the amount of digital files that I am creating is exceeding my ability to store it. ![]() In my other life I'm a decent photographer and I'm doing loads of gigs next year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |